<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Learning Technologies 2010 – Recap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.upsidelearning.com/blog/index.php/2010/01/30/learning-technologies-2010-recap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.upsidelearning.com/blog/index.php/2010/01/30/learning-technologies-2010-recap/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:15:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amit</title>
		<link>http://www.upsidelearning.com/blog/index.php/2010/01/30/learning-technologies-2010-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-12125</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upsidelearning.com/blog/?p=3069#comment-12125</guid>
		<description>Hi Donald, I am pleased that you found the summaries to be good. And happy to note that the online community treats them as a valuable resource. Congratulations once again on a great conference. Cheers!
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Donald, I am pleased that you found the summaries to be good. And happy to note that the online community treats them as a valuable resource. Congratulations once again on a great conference. Cheers!<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit</title>
		<link>http://www.upsidelearning.com/blog/index.php/2010/01/30/learning-technologies-2010-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-12124</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upsidelearning.com/blog/?p=3069#comment-12124</guid>
		<description>Trina, Happy to note that you found it useful. Thanks for leaving a comment 

Mark, Your points are very valid.
I agree that it is the vendors&#039; responsibility to offer better way of doing things. We certainly try to help our clients on that. Just as an example I met a prospect today morning who is a trainig  provider and has never done eLearning. They are driven by the desire to add value (&amp; to some extent forced by recession too) want to make their solutions better with some eLearning value adds. Of course they are also looking to expand their market by expanding into newer client bases - ones that can&#039;t afford them right now or ones to whom they can&#039;t travel t deliver ILT sessions. And to this prospect, I was discussin about thinking of how they should think of adding social media components to their solutions. The bottom line I think is the vendors who don&#039;t offer better solutions would themselved perish!
I do agree with you on your thoughts on the incorporation of social media in LMS. Its my mistake that the link to UpsideLMS in the post above was earlier directed to our traditional LMS. We have most of the features in place and a few more in the works. My colleague Abhijit Kadle posted a small write up on the same today. I think you have already seen that. The write is available here: &lt;a title=&quot;UpsideLMS: LMS and ANS&quot; href=&quot;../../../02/05/the-lms-and-sns-a-fine-balance/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The LMS and SNS: A Fine Balance&lt;/a&gt;.
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trina, Happy to note that you found it useful. Thanks for leaving a comment </p>
<p>Mark, Your points are very valid.<br />
I agree that it is the vendors&#8217; responsibility to offer better way of doing things. We certainly try to help our clients on that. Just as an example I met a prospect today morning who is a trainig  provider and has never done eLearning. They are driven by the desire to add value (&amp; to some extent forced by recession too) want to make their solutions better with some eLearning value adds. Of course they are also looking to expand their market by expanding into newer client bases &#8211; ones that can&#8217;t afford them right now or ones to whom they can&#8217;t travel t deliver ILT sessions. And to this prospect, I was discussin about thinking of how they should think of adding social media components to their solutions. The bottom line I think is the vendors who don&#8217;t offer better solutions would themselved perish!<br />
I do agree with you on your thoughts on the incorporation of social media in LMS. Its my mistake that the link to UpsideLMS in the post above was earlier directed to our traditional LMS. We have most of the features in place and a few more in the works. My colleague Abhijit Kadle posted a small write up on the same today. I think you have already seen that. The write is available here: <a title="UpsideLMS: LMS and ANS" href="../../../02/05/the-lms-and-sns-a-fine-balance/" rel="nofollow">The LMS and SNS: A Fine Balance</a>.<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald H Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.upsidelearning.com/blog/index.php/2010/01/30/learning-technologies-2010-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-12111</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald H Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upsidelearning.com/blog/?p=3069#comment-12111</guid>
		<description>Amit - thanks for the great summary (and the one for day 2). It has really been picked up by the online community as a valuable resource. For other summaries of the event, see: bit.ly/9o594t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amit &#8211; thanks for the great summary (and the one for day 2). It has really been picked up by the online community as a valuable resource. For other summaries of the event, see: bit.ly/9o594t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Learning Technologies 2010 Conference Update</title>
		<link>http://www.upsidelearning.com/blog/index.php/2010/01/30/learning-technologies-2010-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-12053</link>
		<dc:creator>Learning Technologies 2010 Conference Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upsidelearning.com/blog/?p=3069#comment-12053</guid>
		<description>[...] 2010 Conference, so I am grateful that Amit Garg of Upside Learning was able to attend and summarize some of the messages and the innovations shown at the conference. These [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2010 Conference, so I am grateful that Amit Garg of Upside Learning was able to attend and summarize some of the messages and the innovations shown at the conference. These [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Berthelemy</title>
		<link>http://www.upsidelearning.com/blog/index.php/2010/01/30/learning-technologies-2010-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-11812</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Berthelemy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upsidelearning.com/blog/?p=3069#comment-11812</guid>
		<description>Hi Amit,
Thanks for your comments on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.learningconversations.co.uk/main/index.php/2010/01/30/reflections-on-learning-technologies-2010-lt10uk?blog=5&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my own reflections of the conference&lt;/a&gt;. I know (from experience) that it is hard for vendors to lead the thinking, as you then run the risk of not selling any products or services. I also agree that many purchasing organisations are just not ready to be led too far. They simply wish to take existing ideas into an online environment.
But don&#039;t vendors have a duty to challenge the status quo? To suggest better ways of doing things?
I know that you say the UpsideLMS has a social media pack incorporated, but, as far as I can see, that just means a blogging section? That&#039;s a start. However, for me, social learning is much bigger than that. It means the ability to comment on and rate &lt;strong&gt;any&lt;/strong&gt; piece of content on the site. It means the ability to find out who created that content and what else they have created. It means being able to assess the reputation of people and their background. Look at Amazon, Youtube, Slideshare, Ebay etc. Knowledge is no longer something that can be seen only in terms of top-down delivery. In fact top down needs to prove its worth now on a level playing field. (See this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ted.com/talks/alexis_ohanian_how_to_make_a_splash_in_social_media.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;short TED talk on social media&lt;/a&gt;). It looks like this is the sort of approach BT is adopting.
I did like your comment above about Charles Jennings&#039; talk on experiential learning. I&#039;d heard other people express similar disappointment that it didn&#039;t really practice what he was preaching!
It&#039;s a pity we didn&#039;t get a chance to meet up at the conference. Perhaps another time.
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Amit,<br />
Thanks for your comments on <a href="http://www.learningconversations.co.uk/main/index.php/2010/01/30/reflections-on-learning-technologies-2010-lt10uk?blog=5" rel="nofollow">my own reflections of the conference</a>. I know (from experience) that it is hard for vendors to lead the thinking, as you then run the risk of not selling any products or services. I also agree that many purchasing organisations are just not ready to be led too far. They simply wish to take existing ideas into an online environment.<br />
But don&#8217;t vendors have a duty to challenge the status quo? To suggest better ways of doing things?<br />
I know that you say the UpsideLMS has a social media pack incorporated, but, as far as I can see, that just means a blogging section? That&#8217;s a start. However, for me, social learning is much bigger than that. It means the ability to comment on and rate <strong>any</strong> piece of content on the site. It means the ability to find out who created that content and what else they have created. It means being able to assess the reputation of people and their background. Look at Amazon, Youtube, Slideshare, Ebay etc. Knowledge is no longer something that can be seen only in terms of top-down delivery. In fact top down needs to prove its worth now on a level playing field. (See this <a href="http://www.ted.com/talks/alexis_ohanian_how_to_make_a_splash_in_social_media.html" rel="nofollow">short TED talk on social media</a>). It looks like this is the sort of approach BT is adopting.<br />
I did like your comment above about Charles Jennings&#8217; talk on experiential learning. I&#8217;d heard other people express similar disappointment that it didn&#8217;t really practice what he was preaching!<br />
It&#8217;s a pity we didn&#8217;t get a chance to meet up at the conference. Perhaps another time.<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trina</title>
		<link>http://www.upsidelearning.com/blog/index.php/2010/01/30/learning-technologies-2010-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-11699</link>
		<dc:creator>Trina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upsidelearning.com/blog/?p=3069#comment-11699</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the update Amit. These were the sessions which I did not attend so it was great to get a peek before they go up on the LSG forum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the update Amit. These were the sessions which I did not attend so it was great to get a peek before they go up on the LSG forum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

